Announcement

Collapse

You can find details about the Wildcat Nation Tailgate in the football forum. We hope to see you there!

The Official Olivier Sarr Thread (UPDATE: NCAA Rules Sarr Eligible, SEC Hasn't Yet)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • justford
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2014
    • 4669

    #226
    If the SEC rule is in fact valid, did the UK people not know about it? What would UK’s argument be to make an exception for Sarr?

    Comment

    • Los Gatos
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2014
      • 1693

      #227
      Originally posted by justford
      If the SEC rule is in fact valid, did the UK people not know about it? What would UK’s argument be to make an exception for Sarr?
      Don't have any idea what UK could argue to make an exception. As for, did UK know about the rule, it's been on the books for years. I have to assume they knew about the rule.

      Comment

      • Joneslab
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2014
        • 39604

        #228
        I'm sure UK knew but I definitely didn't.

        It's a bizarre rule that should never have been on the books. If you can take grad transfers for a year then you should be able to take undergrad transfers. Makes no sense.

        However, the problem is if other players had been hit by it in the past. If that's the case then waiving it for Sarr is obviously unfair.

        Comment

        • Joneslab
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2014
          • 39604

          #229
          Also, a weird thing is the delay that's going on right now.

          If the transfer is against the rules, then just flatly deny eligibility. That the SEC seems to be hedging suggests Kentucky is making a case...and really what could the case be other than the one they already brought to the NCAA? There's no other information they could offer to the league.

          The SEC appears to be listening or they'd just rule him ineligible. Hard to imagine with a UK player they just wouldn't rule at all one way or the other and let Sarr sit. The SEC wouldn't want to enrage the very fans it counts on like that.

          So something is creating this delay. Which suggests either (1) the SEC wants to waive the rule and is trying to figure out how to do it and not create a crapstorm with other league coaches; or (2) as the other poster said, the league is hoping to remain mum and let COVID wash the season away so they don't have to rule.

          Comment

          • Los Gatos
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2014
            • 1693

            #230
            Originally posted by Will Lavender
            Also, a weird thing is the delay that's going on right now.

            If the transfer is against the rules, then just flatly deny eligibility. That the SEC seems to be hedging suggests Kentucky is making a case...and really what could the case be other than the one they already brought to the NCAA? There's no other information they could offer to the league.

            The SEC appears to be listening or they'd just rule him ineligible. Hard to imagine with a UK player they just wouldn't rule at all one way or the other and let Sarr sit. The SEC wouldn't want to enrage the very fans it counts on like that.

            So something is creating this delay. Which suggests either (1) the SEC wants to waive the rule and is trying to figure out how to do it and not create a crapstorm with other league coaches; or (2) as the other poster said, the league is hoping to remain mum and let COVID wash the season away so they don't have to rule.
            I suspect it's the latter.

            Comment

            • Joneslab
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2014
              • 39604

              #231
              The men's basketball steering committee will meet today and vote on whether to give players another year of eligibility after this season like they've done in football.

              That's what the SEC is waiting on. If the rule is voted through, which I assume it will be, then Sarr should be eligible. Maybe by today.

              Comment

              • Joneslab
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2014
                • 39604

                #232
                Originally posted by Will Lavender
                The men's basketball steering committee will meet today and vote on whether to give players another year of eligibility after this season like they've done in football.

                That's what the SEC is waiting on. If the rule is voted through, which I assume it will be, then Sarr should be eligible. Maybe by today.
                Actually, check this. Today they will only give a recommendation. The NCAA at large will vote on it on a later date (not sure when).

                So Sarr likely won't be eligible today.

                Comment

                • Joneslab
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2014
                  • 39604

                  #233
                  Sarr isn't the only player we're waiting on. Jon Hale says that UK has also applied for a waiver for Jacob Toppin, maybe the most-forgotten Wildcat of all time.

                  Don't think Toppin could help that much this year but has some upside for down the road.

                  Comment

                  • George
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2014
                    • 10355

                    #234
                    The NCAA approved an additional year of eligibility for winter athletes. If this was what Sankey was waiting for, there should be nothing standing in the way of Sarr’s eligibility.

                    Comment

                    • Matt Dillon
                      Administrator
                      • Oct 2014
                      • 49625

                      #235
                      Originally posted by Downes Van Zandt
                      The NCAA approved an additional year of eligibility for winter athletes. If this was what Sankey was waiting for, there should be nothing standing in the way of Sarr’s eligibility.
                      I believe it's eff. 2021. Does that mean Sarr won't be eligible until Jan.?
                      Philippians 4:11-4:13

                      Comment

                      • Joneslab
                        Senior Member
                        • Oct 2014
                        • 39604

                        #236
                        Originally posted by Matt Dillon

                        I believe it's eff. 2021. Does that mean Sarr won't be eligible until Jan.?
                        Where did you see this? I can't find any articles about it because apparently it isn't fully done yet but should be official today.

                        If it's true it isn't effective until 2021, then that could simply mean that the extra year of eligibility kicks in in 2021. Otherwise I'm not really sure what "effective 2021" could mean with this particular rule.

                        Comment

                        • Los Gatos
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2014
                          • 1693

                          #237
                          Originally posted by Downes Van Zandt
                          The NCAA approved an additional year of eligibility for winter athletes. If this was what Sankey was waiting for, there should be nothing standing in the way of Sarr’s eligibility.
                          The NCAA Division I Council has officially voted in favor of granting an additional year of eligibility for athletes participating in winter sports during the 2020-21 season. According to college basketball insider Jeff Goodman, the DI Council voted in favor of the blanket waiver allowing athletes to retain their year of eligibility this winter whether […]

                          Comment

                          • justford
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2014
                            • 4669

                            #238
                            Originally posted by Will Lavender

                            Where did you see this? I can't find any articles about it because apparently it isn't fully done yet but should be official today.

                            If it's true it isn't effective until 2021, then that could simply mean that the extra year of eligibility kicks in in 2021. Otherwise I'm not really sure what "effective 2021" could mean with this particular rule.
                            Maybe people are confusing the one time transfer rule with the waiver rule??

                            Comment

                            • Jload
                              Senior Member
                              • Sep 2015
                              • 2058

                              #239
                              Why is it taking so long, this isn’t engineering a rocket for interstellar flight. How hard is it to review a file and make a stinking decision. Why doesn’t UK ,especially Barnhart do a little arm twisting in the league office and GET THIS DONE. Does anybody believe if this were Alabama and this was a football issue it wouldn’t be resolved by now. UK is it’s equivalent in basketball, so why aren’t we demanding similar respect, and don’t tell me about rules, that has never mattered to league when dealing with its football elite.

                              Comment

                              • Joneslab
                                Senior Member
                                • Oct 2014
                                • 39604

                                #240
                                Originally posted by Jload
                                Why is it taking so long, this isn’t engineering a rocket for interstellar flight. How hard is it to review a file and make a stinking decision. Why doesn’t UK ,especially Barnhart do a little arm twisting in the league office and GET THIS DONE. Does anybody believe if this were Alabama and this was a football issue it wouldn’t be resolved by now. UK is it’s equivalent in basketball, so why aren’t we demanding similar respect, and don’t tell me about rules, that has never mattered to league when dealing with its football elite.
                                The extra-year rule hasn't been fully adopted yet. Happening today.

                                Comment

                                 

                                Forum Ch-ch-changes - Report Here

                                Hello All! You may see some things bouncing around, colors changing, and functionality being added and removed as we look at how to make some requested...
                                 

                                A Word From Our Founder

                                With the recent discussion of rules and what is and is not posted I set out to find what our mission statement originally was and this is what I found:...

                                The Official Olivier Sarr Thread (UPDATE: NCAA Rules Sarr Eligible, SEC Hasn't Yet)

                                Collapse
                                Working...