OK teamchemistry15

[Joneslab]

Could be worse.

You might think that but your second pick is one Bike knee brace worn by Todd Svoboda.

[Lighthouse]

I just did the drawing here at work. I got Anthony Davis Downes got Skal Lighthouse got Bobby Perry teamchemistry got Wah Wah Jones and Kevin got Morakinyo Williams.

Totally fair drawing sorry guys

[teamchemistry15]

I just did the drawing here at work. I got Anthony Davis Downes got Skal Lighthouse got Bobby Perry teamchemistry got Wah Wah Jones and Kevin got Morakinyo Williams.

Totally fair drawing sorry guys

You gave me an All-American. Thanks!

[Joneslab]

You gave me an All-American. Thanks!

Sorry, I misspoke.

You got Wah Wah's twin brother, Booby. He lettered in lawn darts.

[teamchemistry15]

So, here's a start to the rules:

Six players per team (unless there's not a bunch of participants, then we could do more)

It will go in the snake order so if you pick first in round one you pick last in round two

Someone (not Will) can put our names in a hat and draw the order at random

Only UK players

You must have one player who committed to every coach (Did we decide to scratch BCG?)

Only their accomplishments at UK count (maybe for a wrinkle we could use one players success in the NBA. Maybe two)

You have to have an actual team. One at each position of PG, SG, SF, PF, and C.

At some point you have to pick a coach. Obviously each coach will be used more than once. Maybe another wrinkle could be opening it to all coaches and not just Kentucky?

At the end we can do another drawing to setup a tournament or just seed it as is. We will setup a poll for each game and vote on the winner.

I don't like the salary cap idea because, as Kevin said, it'll just get too complicated. There's over 100 players we are dealing with and I can already see the arguments happening over why one player is worth more than this one, but this one was too high, etc. Plus, you have to figure it'll go pretty much in order anyway. All of the high dollar guys will be gone in round one.

I think, since I won last year, I should get to make one selection for everyone.

[teamchemistry15]

Is it possible to ban Will from this thread?

[George]

You must have one player who committed to every coach.

Why, though? This is just an arbitrary rule that'll draw the same arguments about whether or not Dan Issel would've been good enough to play today.

If we're going to make a change to the draft, let's make it a strategic wrinkle. Doesn't have to be the salary cap, but something that actually changes the draft strategy.

[uglyduckling]

Salary cap would be fun if it was a live draft.

[teamchemistry15]

Why, though? This is just an arbitrary rule that'll draw the same arguments about whether or not Dan Issel would've been good enough to play today.

If we're going to make a change to the draft, let's make it a strategic wrinkle. Doesn't have to be the salary cap, but something that actually changes the draft strategy.

It isn't about if they could compete today. It's about their accomplishments to the school. I thought it seemed like most agreed on this, but we don't have to. It makes no difference to me.

[Blue Heaven]

I have no idea what you guys are cooking up but it sounds good. Need another?

[George]

I have no idea what you guys are cooking up but it sounds good. Need another?

Absolutely. If you weren't in on this last year, you definitely need to join us this time around. It's a blast.

[teamchemistry15]

I have no idea what you guys are cooking up but it sounds good. Need another?

It was a ton of fun. It really put some life into the board during the down time.

[teamchemistry15]

Did we do 12 hours in between picks last year? Or a full day?

[Blue Heaven]

Count me in then. I will make sure to check this thread regularly.

[Lighthouse]

Count me in then. I will make sure to check this thread regularly.

You will have some great fun, Glad you're joining in.