My goodness

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 5
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 template Next
  • surveyor
    Administrator
    • Oct 2014
    • 14472
    #61
    Originally posted by justford
    Playing Devil's advocate here. If he had turned the program around he would had been a sought after coach considering his last name and he turned the Kentucky program around.
    That being said, I am against contract extensions based on short term results.
    Sure, but do the extension at the end of the season, don't do it midway into his second season of a 4 (or 5?) year contract.

    The flip side is firing coaches after 2 or 3 years of a 4 or 5 year deal. If we want that, then just sign them to 2 or 3 year contracts.

    Agreed regarding extensions on short term results.
    Extremism is so easy. You've got your position, and that's it. It doesn't take much thought. And when you go far enough to the right you meet the same idiots coming around from the left.

    Clint Eastwood

      Comment

      • 40bill
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2014
        • 8454
        #62
        I would say Mitch B doesn't like coaching searches. He agreed to the coach in waiting program when Brooks was considering retiring and signed CMS to an extension on his first five win season....likely counting on seven the next year when we had what????? Eight home games?

          Comment

          Previous 1 2 3 4 5 template Next

          My goodness

          Collapse
          Working...

            Debug Information