Announcement

Collapse

You can find details about the Wildcat Nation Tailgate in the football forum. We hope to see you there!

UK-UGa. Game Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • George
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2014
    • 10355

    #121
    Originally posted by Matt Dillon


    This may be his breakout season. State is currently 5-3, and second in their division, with one of those wins coming over Oregon.
    This is where Stoops gets some slack from me. We're talking SEC vs. Pac-whatever. Not saying Kentucky could currently march through that league, but I also think wins are easier to come by up there. Plus - and maybe this also bodes well for Stoops - Leach is in, what, his fifth season? Stoops' breakout, if there's gonna be one, might just take a little longer than we'd like.

    Comment

    • Matt Dillon
      Administrator
      • Oct 2014
      • 49618

      #122
      I used to be in favor of UK leaving the SEC, but the way we're playing this season, we wouldn't win many games in any of the Power 5 Conferences, in my opinion.
      Philippians 4:11-4:13

      Comment

      • 40bill
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2014
        • 8451

        #123
        I've felt for a few years that Kentucky should have made the ACC jump before Louisville. Basketball would be off the chain and UK could develop into at least a mid to high mid player in football.

        Comment

        • Westtncat
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2014
          • 2031

          #124
          Im not gonna act like because I watched the game or Kentucky football that I know more than the coaches but I do have some concerns. If all positions are up for competition , is this the best we have? What happen to all those yahtzees? How is it I look at my TV each week and see virtually every school having a better QB than we do?

          Comment

          • Matt Dillon
            Administrator
            • Oct 2014
            • 49618

            #125
            One thing that saddens me is that, as the season has progressed, teams like Fl., So. Car., Vandy and Louisville that started off so slow seem to be making big strides while we're regressing.
            Philippians 4:11-4:13

            Comment

            • Westtncat
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2014
              • 2031

              #126
              Originally posted by Matt Dillon
              One thing that saddens me is that, as the season has progressed, teams like Fl., So. Car., Vandy and Louisville that started off so slow seem to be making big strides while we're regressing.
              I think appearances are deceiving. I wish KY would play someone early on. We beat some real powder puffs, save USC, then pretty much got killed by the other SEC competition. I think its where we have always been. Though I do agree the effort does seem different.

              In many ways not the same team that beat USC and played Florida close. I think part of the problem is that we are very predictable and once you scout us you beat us because we seem incapable of any type of change or adjustments.

              Comment

              • UK39
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2014
                • 246

                #127
                I hope Dawson goes the same route as Brown. Im willing to give Stoops next year but if they don't progress, I'm done supporting him. This program is at the point where you replace the coordinators and hire a ST coach to save Stoops job.

                It has to be pretty damming to have this 2 years in a row.

                Comment

                • Matt Dillon
                  Administrator
                  • Oct 2014
                  • 49618

                  #128
                  Originally posted by UK39
                  I hope Dawson goes the same route as Brown. Im willing to give Stoops next year but if they don't progress, I'm done supporting him. This program is at the point where you replace the coordinators and hire a ST coach to save Stoops job.

                  It has to be pretty damming to have this 2 years in a row.

                  Speaking of Neal Brown, I saw in the H-L, this morning, where Troy has scored 52, 41 and 51 (over La. Monroe) their last three games.
                  Philippians 4:11-4:13

                  Comment

                  • CATHYnKY
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2014
                    • 5568

                    #129
                    Shouldn't get rid of Stoops. Give him another year or 2. Then what? Bear Bryant isn't going to be knocking at the door

                    Comment

                    • Matt Dillon
                      Administrator
                      • Oct 2014
                      • 49618

                      #130
                      Originally posted by CATHYnKY
                      Bear Bryant isn't going to be knocking at the door
                      I certainly hope not.
                      Philippians 4:11-4:13

                      Comment

                      • Spiritof96
                        Senior Member
                        • Oct 2014
                        • 13503

                        #131
                        Originally posted by Matt Dillon


                        Speaking of Neal Brown, I saw in the H-L, this morning, where Troy has scored 52, 41 and 51 (over La. Monroe) their last three games.
                        Hire his OC?

                        Kidding... I don't understand Brown. I never thought the O looked very in sync when he was here. We certainly NEVER looked like Texas Tech. Dawson doesn't seem much different (better or worse). Is it possible that it is just that difficult to move the ball in the SEC? Mummy seemed to have no trouble. I don't know what to think.
                        Originally posted by John Stuart Mill
                        ​He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that... He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them...he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
                        Originally posted by Robert “Hoot” Gibson
                        No matter how bad things may seem, you can always make them worse.
                        RIP: Charlie Munger​

                        Comment

                        • Joneslab
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2014
                          • 39604

                          #132
                          Originally posted by Westtncat
                          In many ways not the same team that beat USC and played Florida close. I think part of the problem is that we are very predictable and once you scout us you beat us because we seem incapable of any type of change or adjustments.
                          To beef up the schedule with a program that has struggled for the better part of the last...well, forever in its league would be the absolute worst thing Kentucky football could do.

                          We've been playing the same kind of schedule since the dawn of time. Brooks went out there and won 8 games with that same schedule. And even this team--and last year's team--was much (much, much) better early on than it has been late.

                          Schedule has absolutely nothing to do with this. This is a teamwide collapse.
                          Last edited by Joneslab; 11-08-2015, 05:49 PM.

                          Comment

                          • Westtncat
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2014
                            • 2031

                            #133
                            Originally posted by Will Lavender

                            To beef up the schedule with a program that has struggled for the better part of the last...well, forever in its league would be the absolute worst thing Kentucky football could do.

                            We've been playing the same kind of schedule since the dawn of time. Brooks went out there and won 8 games with that same schedule. And even this team--and last year's team--was much (much, much) better early on than it has been late.

                            Schedule has absolutely nothing to do with this. This is a teamwide collapse.
                            Will, maybe I didnt explain myself good enough. I don't mean to imply our schedule needs to be changed or beefed up, Im simply saying that maybe we get a false reading on this team every year because we don't really play anyone early. We don't need to beef up our schedule to get a true reading we could change the order of it and still have the powder puffs. Also, if this team has struggled from the beginning of time (its seems) what does it matter? Im actually fine with our schedule and how we play the nobodys but it just doesn't give us a true measure. I guess you can say we played UF fairly early. I agree schedule has nothing to do with it but how do we know its a team wide collapse. Could be what we have been all along. I do have to admit (again) doesnt appear to be the same team, at least effort wise. Then again, the defense cant stay on the field as long as they have. Nobodys can.

                            Comment

                            • Joneslab
                              Senior Member
                              • Oct 2014
                              • 39604

                              #134
                              I think we got a decent reading on them early on, I just think they've sharply regressed. That much can be seen in the eye test.

                              I mean they played right with Florida. They were a drop away from winning that game. This team now would be vicious pummelled by Florida.

                              What they were early on was inconsistent, as EKU and the second half of Louisiana showed. Now they're much more consistent. Consistently bad.

                              Comment

                              • Old School
                                Administrator
                                • Oct 2014
                                • 2218

                                #135
                                A few thoughts on posts above:

                                1) ACC vs. SEC: not even close, and no doubt any SEC team, including Kentucky, would fare much better in the ACC.

                                Louisville lost to Auburn this year but is 4-1 in the ACC, losing only to Florida State. Auburn is 2-4 in the SEC and barely beat Kentucky, by 3 points.

                                North Carolina is 5-0 in the ACC, outscoring their ACC opponents 206-108 (average score 41-21). UNC lost to South Carolina. South Carolina is 1-6 in the SEC, beating only Vanderbilt, and losing at home to Kentucky.

                                Louisville walked over ACC opponents last year, including Notre Dame, except for losses to Florida State and at Clemson and Virginia(!). Louisville, with a late 4th quarter comeback, barely beat UK (2-6 SEC) and Georgia walked all over them in the bowl game.

                                Georgia Tech is 2-12 vs. Georgia since 2000.

                                etc. etc. etc.

                                2) Washington State and Mike Leach, and teams improving over the course of a season:

                                The Cougars' roster was one of the few in D-IA that was as depleted as what Joker left at UK. Leach beat their arch-rival, a bowl-bound Washington team, in his first year, and took the Cougars to a bowl game in his second year. They're going bowling again this year. Now in only his fourth season there, Leach has beaten eight of the other 11 Pac 12 teams already (three of them twice, including Utah), and should add Colorado to that tally this year. (He's 0-1 vs. UCLA and, like everyone else in that conference, hasn't been able to beat Stanford lately, though this year it was a close 30-28 game, lost due to a missed FG attempt.) He has done well there, especially given the horrible situation he came into, and IMO has again proven himself to be one of the best coaches in college football, and maybe the very best in doing more with less.

                                WSU opened the season with a surprising and embarrassing out of conference loss, but they've gone on a roll since. His teams consistently improve throughout the season, year after year. That's pretty important, and is something UK fans have been wishing for recently. They play hard for 60 minutes. They're well coached, confident, smart, tough, and a lot of fun to watch.

                                Mike Leach is an excellent coach. He has taken Texas Tech and Washington State teams up against schools with far better traditions and rosters (at least on paper and online recruiting rankings) and consistently outperformed his predecessors and expectations.

                                3) Kentucky's early season schedule:

                                The third game of the season was against this year's SEC East champions, and the fourth was against last year's SEC East champions. The second game of the season was an SEC contest on the road against a team that has been bowling seven seasons in a row, has three 11 win seasons in the past four, and was 13-1 against Kentucky going into last year's game. The opener was against a team on a streak of four straight 9 win seasons, finishing first or second in its conference each of those years. That's a pretty decent opening run for a young team on a streak of 5-7, 2-10, 2-10, 5-7. It also fares pretty well against what a lot of other SEC teams have done in recent years to open their campaigns.

                                4) problems:

                                Yes, Kentucky has been way too inconsistent, especially on offense, and hasn't improved over the course of the season. Both are serious problems. Is that due to QB play? OC inexperience? Team-wide attitudes? We'll find out. Until then, we can guess. That's what this forum is for. But despite everyone being dismayed at the second third of the season, there's no reason for anyone to be uncivil to other fans while we talk about it in here. If you aren't enjoying the games so much, you should at least enjoy the company you're in here.


                                Comment

                                 

                                Forum Ch-ch-changes - Report Here

                                Hello All! You may see some things bouncing around, colors changing, and functionality being added and removed as we look at how to make some requested...
                                 

                                A Word From Our Founder

                                With the recent discussion of rules and what is and is not posted I set out to find what our mission statement originally was and this is what I found:...

                                UK-UGa. Game Thread

                                Collapse
                                Working...