3000 yards passing?
TDs-to-Ints?
Leading rusher?
PPG?
I want to believe that the offense will be sufficiently better, I really do. I think Calzada and Boley both have the potential to be better than Vandagriff (low bar, obviously). The OL, by default, can't be worse, but not convinced it will be a lot better.
One of my biggest concerns is Hamdan. For long stretches of games last year, he showed no feel for the game and play calling. Was that a product of bad OL, poor QB play, certain players needing touches, etc? Maybe. But it could also be that his lack of skill at setting up and calling plays made all of those factors worse.
If we're going to have a snowball's chance of reaching .500, the offense has to be much better.
But, will it be?
I don't expect 3000 yards passing. I would guess 22 TDs to 10 Ints. RB by committee with the leader having 550 yds. Ppg...let's go with 26 but only 19 in SEC games.
TDs-to-Ints?
Leading rusher?
PPG?
I want to believe that the offense will be sufficiently better, I really do. I think Calzada and Boley both have the potential to be better than Vandagriff (low bar, obviously). The OL, by default, can't be worse, but not convinced it will be a lot better.
One of my biggest concerns is Hamdan. For long stretches of games last year, he showed no feel for the game and play calling. Was that a product of bad OL, poor QB play, certain players needing touches, etc? Maybe. But it could also be that his lack of skill at setting up and calling plays made all of those factors worse.
If we're going to have a snowball's chance of reaching .500, the offense has to be much better.
But, will it be?
I don't expect 3000 yards passing. I would guess 22 TDs to 10 Ints. RB by committee with the leader having 550 yds. Ppg...let's go with 26 but only 19 in SEC games.
Comment