The pressure is starting to get to me but the above observations have calmed me a bit. Pulling our second leading rusher is a bit nerve racking. I know we definitely have to improve our passing game to move from being really good to exceptional. Granted that Mizzou's stats are not very good when it comes to the pass rush. It just puts a lot of pressure on Hoak and Clark. Going into a live-fire game in a hostile environment, a mistake will bring out the worse part of our fan base. We have to try and keep the Mizzou offense off the field as much as we can so I don't see us throwing the ball all over the field to start the game. I'm a fan of Hoak and Clark too. We need our WR's to step up too.
-
-
Realistically....saying you PLAN to use multiple quarterbacks does NOT mean you will. Game situations have a ton to do with that.
Whoever replaces Wilson, whenever they do, will have to show the team responds to them. Barker was a MUCH better physical talent than Johnson, but the team just didn't respond to him as well.
I doubt either Gunnar nor Danny have the wheels that Terry Wilson has. That takes out an option. If either of them come in, they will have to make up in passing yardage what Wilson gains on the ground.....AND NOT TURN THE BALL OVER.
of course, this could be Stoops way of sending messages to Missouri....#1, don't think you have our offense figured out. #2 It doesn't matter who the quarterback is....our line is going to grind you down for Bennie and Rose, and you're high flying offense hasn't met anything like Kentucky defense.
I like it.Comment
-
Here are facts, Wilson ranks dead last in Sec QB rankings, he has the fewest passing yards, fewest touchdowns, most turnovers and lowest passer rating in the SEC. Yes our record is 6-1 but he has very little to do about it. Without our awesome defense we are 3-4 IMO. Yeah I want to make a change at QB. Can the replacement be much worse I don’t see howComment
Comment