Announcement

Collapse

You can find details about the Wildcat Nation Tailgate in the football forum. We hope to see you there!

Towles Named Starting QB

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Joneslab
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2014
    • 39604

    #1

    Towles Named Starting QB

    Per everybody on Twitter, Stoops just named Patrick the starter. No surprise really.
  • Joneslab
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2014
    • 39604

    #2
    Stoops also says in today's press conference that true freshman Chris Westry is currently a starting cornerback.

    A little surprising?

    Comment

    • KevinHall
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2014
      • 6857

      #3
      Also dismissed OSU transfer Marcyls Jones for rules violations.
      Kentucky fan since 1971.

      Comment

      • DA#23
        Administrator
        • Oct 2014
        • 7342

        #4
        Originally posted by KevinHall
        Also dismissed OSU transfer Marcyls Jones for rules violations.


        We needed him going forward.

        Comment

        • Blue Heaven
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2014
          • 6283

          #5
          Originally posted by KevinHall
          Also dismissed OSU transfer Marcyls Jones for rules violations.
          That really sucks. At least we have a nice O Line class coming in for next year.
          Isaiah 5:20

          Comment

          • Blue Heaven
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2014
            • 6283

            #6
            Towles is no surprise as the starter. He deserves it and obviously earned it. I wonder if Drew really pushed him that much or was it just a motivation factor. The staff has been high on Westry. A good talent at the CB spot and he is big. I like the look of our defense not only for this year but the future as well. We were decent aginst the pass last year but that's because teams ran over us at will. That needs to change ASAP.
            Isaiah 5:20

            Comment

            • TrueblueCATfan
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2014
              • 16272

              #7
              Congrats to Patrick...now lets go win some games and go to a bowl

              Comment

              • gerntz
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2014
                • 646

                #8
                Originally posted by matt colvin



                We needed him going forward.
                Based on what we thought we knew, yes. Based on what CMS knows, not. I take the latter point as meaning we're better off with him gone & his being part of the future was only a a figment. Too bad for both parties.

                Comment

                • gerntz
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2014
                  • 646

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Will Lavender
                  Per everybody on Twitter, Stoops just named Patrick the starter. No surprise really.
                  I'm not sure what Drew could have done given his lack of game experience. Just can't beat that unless you're h&s above him in talent. Have to think Barker will get some chances to show though.

                  Comment

                  • DA#23
                    Administrator
                    • Oct 2014
                    • 7342

                    #10
                    Originally posted by gerntz
                    Based on what we thought we knew, yes.
                    Continuity of O-Line growth and development, especially where we are right now, would have been thoroughly blessed by Jones had he worked out.

                    We seem to be seeing a reduction in steps backward after periods of growth, but unfortunately this is a step backward. Hope we can find a nice JUCO or other such player to make an impact while the incoming frosh get ready. I guess Jones will have to go JUCO?

                    Comment

                    • Brasslock
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2014
                      • 737

                      #11
                      This is unfortunate and I never like seeing a young person lose an opportunity. I've seen this happening the past week at more than a few schools as pressure and stress increase and lineups get shuffled. We've lost a couple of OL so this makes 3? Stuff happens. Good stuff happens too but we may not notice it as readily. Probability indicates Barker will get a chance. I can't remember us making it through a year with only one QB.

                      Comment

                      • gerntz
                        Senior Member
                        • Oct 2014
                        • 646

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Brasslock
                        I can't remember us making it through a year with only one QB.
                        2014?

                        Comment

                        • RV
                          Administrator
                          • Oct 2014
                          • 1619

                          #13
                          Originally posted by matt colvin

                          Continuity of O-Line growth and development, especially where we are right now, would have been thoroughly blessed by Jones had he worked out.

                          We seem to be seeing a reduction in steps backward after periods of growth, but unfortunately this is a step backward. Hope we can find a nice JUCO or other such player to make an impact while the incoming frosh get ready. I guess Jones will have to go JUCO?
                          I don't see this as a loss at all. Sometimes you have addition by subtraction. Had he been a factor in the future, that would've been like found money IMO but there were rumblings when he came that there was some baggage involved and the statement was made that Stoops wouldn't put up with any foolishness - and he evidently didn't.

                          Doesn't impact anything as far as I can see as we have a lot of options at guard and since he wasn't enrolled (I assume) it doesn't impact our 25 limits. Would've been a nice practice squad player this year but that is the extent of it going forward.
                          Last edited by RV; 08-17-2015, 06:12 PM. Reason: clarification

                          Comment

                          • teamchemistry15
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2014
                            • 7022

                            #14
                            Does anyone know what he did outside of violating team rules?

                            Comment

                            • Brasslock
                              Senior Member
                              • Nov 2014
                              • 737

                              #15
                              I should have added "other than 2014."

                              Comment

                               

                              Forum Ch-ch-changes - Report Here

                              Hello All! You may see some things bouncing around, colors changing, and functionality being added and removed as we look at how to make some requested...
                               

                              A Word From Our Founder

                              With the recent discussion of rules and what is and is not posted I set out to find what our mission statement originally was and this is what I found:...

                              Towles Named Starting QB

                              Collapse
                              Working...