Announcement

Collapse

You can find details about the Wildcat Nation Tailgate in the football forum. We hope to see you there!

OK, I’ve come to the conclusion that…

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Trueblujr
    Administrator
    • Nov 2014
    • 1849

    #1

    OK, I’ve come to the conclusion that…

    If Stoops true desire was to be a ground and pound coach, we should have recruited QB’s in the mold of Sellers. A mobile dual threat QB. A Lamar Jackson type. Our best years were with Snell, Bowden, Rodriguez. We should have parlayed their success into becoming RB University. I know we made a bowl with Davis and all but I think that offense would have been even more potent with a dual threat QB. I think Stoops downfall was not building off that offensive profile and recruiting to it. Instead he tried to appease fans who wanted a high flying offense by switching to a pro style. That disrupted the type of OLine we recruited to as well. Now we just don’t have any sort of identity.

    just random thoughts several beers in.
    "It don't make much sense that common sense don't make no sense no more" John Prine
  • Jaxcat
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2025
    • 383

    #2
    ^Could not agree more, true. I seriously doubt we'll ever be able to recruit the necessary talent to really run a pro (passing) offense effectively. I've said for at least 2 years now exactly what you just posted. We need an identity and an RPO-based scheme with a true dual threat QB would be something we could recruit to year after year. Plus, with so many SEC schools running pro-style offenses, I believe that would leave many high caliber DT quarterbacks who don't possess the NFL measurables that would be really good QBs for UK (see: Manziel, Pavia, Lamar, et al).

    The plays Boley had some time to throw tonight, our receivers COULD NOT GET OPEN. We don't have the talent to run an NFL offense (unless it's the Ravens/Eagles RPO-based) and I don't believe we ever will.

    Fans want to WIN. Very few care what offense we run as long as we WIN. While no one wants to watch the Iowa offense of a few years ago (although they did end up winning 9 games, IIRC), we can get big, bruising, physical OL, workhorse RBs, slippery, quick DT QBs and enough good WRs and TEs to put a very competitive (and difficult to defend) offense on the field.

    Comment

    • Jload
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2015
      • 2056

      #3
      Bitter truth is our coach is mired in 1970s football philosophy. I don't think he is capable of adjusting to 2025 offensive football. Nobody wins with a 1 dimensional offense in the SEC. Defenses just too good. G Tech is a perfect example of an offense that we could run effectively, IF we had a QB that could run it. Stoops has never really had one except EARLY Levi's when he ran some( before he got hurt and stopped).

      Comment

       

      Forum Ch-ch-changes - Report Here

      Hello All! You may see some things bouncing around, colors changing, and functionality being added and removed as we look at how to make some requested...
       

      A Word From Our Founder

      With the recent discussion of rules and what is and is not posted I set out to find what our mission statement originally was and this is what I found:...

      OK, I’ve come to the conclusion that…

      Collapse
      Working...